On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:09:22AM +, Maninder Singh wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> >On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 05:16:42PM +0530, Maninder Singh wrote:
> >> This patch stops unwinding backtrace in case of below 2 cases.
> >>
> >> (Issue observed while porting stackdepot on ARM, duplicate
> >> entries
Hi Russell,
>On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 05:16:42PM +0530, Maninder Singh wrote:
>> This patch stops unwinding backtrace in case of below 2 cases.
>>
>> (Issue observed while porting stackdepot on ARM, duplicate
>> entries created in stackdepot
>> reference patch for workaround in stackdepot:-
>> htt
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 05:16:42PM +0530, Maninder Singh wrote:
> This patch stops unwinding backtrace in case of below 2 cases.
>
> (Issue observed while porting stackdepot on ARM, duplicate
> entries created in stackdepot
> reference patch for workaround in stackdepot:-
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2
This patch stops unwinding backtrace in case of below 2 cases.
(Issue observed while porting stackdepot on ARM, duplicate
entries created in stackdepot
reference patch for workaround in stackdepot:-
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/11/353
).
1. If address belongs to irq/exception code, ignore it.
sa
4 matches
Mail list logo