From: Joe Perches
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 07:10:06 -0700
> In this case, it seems the simple substitution of
> "unnecessary null" to the subject would have been
> enough validation.
Agreed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Sat, 2014-06-21 at 11:36 +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 10:37:24 +0200 Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > On 20 June 2014 22:36:47 CEST, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > > Fix checkpatch warning:
> > > WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required
> >
> > "probably
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 10:37:24 +0200
Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
>
> On 20 June 2014 22:36:47 CEST, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> >Fix checkpatch warning:
> >WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required
>
> "probably not" implies that there are cases where the check *is* required.
>
On 20 June 2014 22:36:47 CEST, Fabian Frederick wrote:
>Fix checkpatch warning:
>WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required
"probably not" implies that there are cases where the check *is* required.
That means that your commit message should explain why this particular
On 20 June 2014 22:36:47 CEST, Fabian Frederick f...@skynet.be wrote:
Fix checkpatch warning:
WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required
probably not implies that there are cases where the check *is* required.
That means that your commit message should explain why this
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 10:37:24 +0200
Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote:
On 20 June 2014 22:36:47 CEST, Fabian Frederick f...@skynet.be wrote:
Fix checkpatch warning:
WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required
probably not implies that there are cases where the check
On Sat, 2014-06-21 at 11:36 +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 10:37:24 +0200 Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote:
On 20 June 2014 22:36:47 CEST, Fabian Frederick f...@skynet.be wrote:
Fix checkpatch warning:
WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required
From: Joe Perches j...@perches.com
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 07:10:06 -0700
In this case, it seems the simple substitution of
unnecessary null to the subject would have been
enough validation.
Agreed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
Fix checkpatch warning:
WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required
Cc: "David S. Miller"
Cc: Grant Likely
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
---
net/dsa/dsa.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c
Fix checkpatch warning:
WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required
Cc: David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net
Cc: Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick f...@skynet.be
---
net/dsa/dsa.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1
10 matches
Mail list logo
