Re: [PATCH 1/1] sh: add support for cmpxchg on u8 and u16 pointers

Hi Liam, On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:34 PM Liam Beguin wrote: > On Wed Aug 19, 2020 at 5:09 AM EDT, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 5:07 AM Liam Beguin > > wrote: > > > The kernel test bot reported[1] that using set_mask_bits on a u8 causes > > > the following issue on SuperH

Re: [PATCH 1/1] sh: add support for cmpxchg on u8 and u16 pointers

Hi Geert, On Wed Aug 19, 2020 at 5:09 AM EDT, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Liam, > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 5:07 AM Liam Beguin > wrote: > > The kernel test bot reported[1] that using set_mask_bits on a u8 causes > > the following issue on SuperH: > > > > >> ERROR: modpost: "__cmpxchg_call

Re: [PATCH 1/1] sh: add support for cmpxchg on u8 and u16 pointers

Hi Liam, On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 5:07 AM Liam Beguin wrote: > The kernel test bot reported[1] that using set_mask_bits on a u8 causes > the following issue on SuperH: > > >> ERROR: modpost: "__cmpxchg_called_with_bad_pointer" > [drivers/phy/ti/phy-tusb1210.ko] undefined! > > Add support for

[PATCH 1/1] sh: add support for cmpxchg on u8 and u16 pointers

The kernel test bot reported[1] that using set_mask_bits on a u8 causes the following issue on SuperH: >> ERROR: modpost: "__cmpxchg_called_with_bad_pointer" [drivers/phy/ti/phy-tusb1210.ko] undefined! Add support for cmpxchg on u8 and u16 pointers. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/pat