On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 5:35 PM Deepa Dinamani wrote:
>
> > > > It's been 2 weeks and this fix hasn't appeared in mmots / mmotm.
> > > > I also noticed it's missing Cc: for stable@ (below)
> > >
> > > Why is a -stable backport needed? I see some talk above about lost
> > > signals but it is
> > > It's been 2 weeks and this fix hasn't appeared in mmots / mmotm.
> > > I also noticed it's missing Cc: for stable@ (below)
> >
> > Why is a -stable backport needed? I see some talk above about lost
> > signals but it is unclear whether these are being observed after fixing
> > the
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2019 09:25:51 + Eric Wong wrote:
>
> > Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > > For all the syscalls that receive a sigmask from the userland,
> > > the user sigmask is to be in effect through the syscall execution.
> > > At the end of syscall, sigmask of the
On Tue, 21 May 2019 09:25:51 + Eric Wong wrote:
> Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > For all the syscalls that receive a sigmask from the userland,
> > the user sigmask is to be in effect through the syscall execution.
> > At the end of syscall, sigmask of the current process is restored
> > to what
It's been 2 weeks and this fix hasn't appeared in mmots / mmotm.
I also noticed it's missing Cc: for stable@ (below)
Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> For all the syscalls that receive a sigmask from the userland,
> the user sigmask is to be in effect through the syscall execution.
> At the end of
For all the syscalls that receive a sigmask from the userland,
the user sigmask is to be in effect through the syscall execution.
At the end of syscall, sigmask of the current process is restored
to what it was before the switch over to user sigmask.
But, for this to be true in practice, the
6 matches
Mail list logo
