Russell,
Thanks for your time reviewing this patch.
On 25-04-2013 13:44, Russell King wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:46:16AM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
index f20c1cf..5027833 100644
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:46:16AM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> index f20c1cf..5027833 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> +++
This patch changes the driver to avoid the usage of IS_ERR_OR_NULL()
macro. This macro can lead to dangerous results, like returning
success (0) during a failure scenario (NULL pointer handling).
For this reason this patch is changing the driver after
revisiting the code. These are the cases:
i.
This patch changes the driver to avoid the usage of IS_ERR_OR_NULL()
macro. This macro can lead to dangerous results, like returning
success (0) during a failure scenario (NULL pointer handling).
For this reason this patch is changing the driver after
revisiting the code. These are the cases:
i.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:46:16AM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
index f20c1cf..5027833 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
+++
Russell,
Thanks for your time reviewing this patch.
On 25-04-2013 13:44, Russell King wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:46:16AM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
index f20c1cf..5027833 100644
6 matches
Mail list logo