Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3

2007-09-18 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Borislav Petkov wrote: > +#define DMA_64BIT_MASK ~0ULL > One more tiny nit: this should probably be (parenthesized). J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

[PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3

2007-09-18 Thread Borislav Petkov
These patches remove redundant DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions across two drivers. The computation of the majority of the bitmasks is done by the compiler. The initial split of the patch touching each a different file got removed due to possible git bisect breakage. Andrew, can you please apply this

[PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3

2007-09-18 Thread Borislav Petkov
These patches remove redundant DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions across two drivers. The computation of the majority of the bitmasks is done by the compiler. The initial split of the patch touching each a different file got removed due to possible git bisect breakage. Andrew, can you please apply this

Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3

2007-09-18 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Borislav Petkov wrote: +#define DMA_64BIT_MASK ~0ULL One more tiny nit: this should probably be (parenthesized). J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at