On 10/16/2012 11:26 AM, Jacob Shin wrote:
Right, we are (AMD) thinking about the same thing .. how to backport to
stable kernels of major enterprise OSes
The simplest and the least disruptive solution would be to not map memory
holes that occur above 4GB, it won't affect 32 bit kernels, and it
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 12:02 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 11:26 AM, Jacob Shin wrote:
> >
> > HPA, it would be great if we can first get this patch upstream, and also
> > into the stable trees .. and after that, we can work on getting Yinghai's
> > mm refactoring in ..
> >
>
>
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 12:02 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 10/16/2012 11:26 AM, Jacob Shin wrote:
HPA, it would be great if we can first get this patch upstream, and also
into the stable trees .. and after that, we can work on getting Yinghai's
mm refactoring in ..
I'll be back
On 10/16/2012 11:26 AM, Jacob Shin wrote:
Right, we are (AMD) thinking about the same thing .. how to backport to
stable kernels of major enterprise OSes
The simplest and the least disruptive solution would be to not map memory
holes that occur above 4GB, it won't affect 32 bit kernels, and it
On 10/16/2012 11:26 AM, Jacob Shin wrote:
>
> HPA, it would be great if we can first get this patch upstream, and also
> into the stable trees .. and after that, we can work on getting Yinghai's
> mm refactoring in ..
>
I'll be back from travels tomorrow, I'll look at it then.
-hpa
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:48:58AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 16:55 +, Shin, Jacob wrote:
> > (Sorry for the top post, on mobile phone..)
> >
> > You can follow the latest thread here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/30/23
> >
> > Yinghai's for-x86-mm branch should
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 16:55 +, Shin, Jacob wrote:
> (Sorry for the top post, on mobile phone..)
>
> You can follow the latest thread here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/30/23
>
> Yinghai's for-x86-mm branch should boot 1TB AMD with hoisting
> enabled.
>
> Thanks!
Jacob,
Thanks. This
Jacob,
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 17:09 -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> The entire HT hole and also the unused address range before that hole
> need to be excluded from direct mapping. Otherwise speculative
> accesses to that reserved region can happen which cause machine
> checks.
Has the HT support even
Jacob,
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 17:09 -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
The entire HT hole and also the unused address range before that hole
need to be excluded from direct mapping. Otherwise speculative
accesses to that reserved region can happen which cause machine
checks.
Has the HT support even
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 16:55 +, Shin, Jacob wrote:
(Sorry for the top post, on mobile phone..)
You can follow the latest thread here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/30/23
Yinghai's for-x86-mm branch should boot 1TB AMD with hoisting
enabled.
Thanks!
Jacob,
Thanks. This includes
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:48:58AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 16:55 +, Shin, Jacob wrote:
(Sorry for the top post, on mobile phone..)
You can follow the latest thread here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/30/23
Yinghai's for-x86-mm branch should boot 1TB AMD
On 10/16/2012 11:26 AM, Jacob Shin wrote:
HPA, it would be great if we can first get this patch upstream, and also
into the stable trees .. and after that, we can work on getting Yinghai's
mm refactoring in ..
I'll be back from travels tomorrow, I'll look at it then.
-hpa
--
To
12 matches
Mail list logo
