On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:09:12AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 09:16 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >Hi Daniel,
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Added Lorenzo and Catalin.
>
> >>Hi Jisheng,
> >>
> >>this should be handled in the arm_cpuidle_read_ops function.
> >>
> >
> >Thanks for reviewing. After
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:31:39 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 10:43 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:41:09 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/30/2016 10:17 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:09:12 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/30/2016 10:43 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:41:09 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/30/2016 10:17 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:09:12 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/30/2016 09:16 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Hi Daniel,
[ ... ]
Added Lorenzo and Ca
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:41:09 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 10:17 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:09:12 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/30/2016 09:16 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >>> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> [ ... ]
> >>
> >> Added Lorenzo and Catalin.
>
On 03/30/2016 10:17 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:09:12 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/30/2016 09:16 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Hi Daniel,
[ ... ]
Added Lorenzo and Catalin.
Hi Jisheng,
this should be handled in the arm_cpuidle_read_ops function.
Thanks for reviewin
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:09:12 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 09:16 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Added Lorenzo and Catalin.
>
> >> Hi Jisheng,
> >>
> >> this should be handled in the arm_cpuidle_read_ops function.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing. Afte
On 03/30/2016 09:16 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Hi Daniel,
[ ... ]
Added Lorenzo and Catalin.
Hi Jisheng,
this should be handled in the arm_cpuidle_read_ops function.
Thanks for reviewing. After some consideration, I think this patch isn't correct
There may be platforms which doesn't need t
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:46:10 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/24/2016 06:11 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Let's assume cpuidle_ops exists but it doesn't implement the according
> > init member, current arm_cpuidle_init() will return success to its
> > caller, but in fact it should re
On 03/24/2016 06:11 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Let's assume cpuidle_ops exists but it doesn't implement the according
init member, current arm_cpuidle_init() will return success to its
caller, but in fact it should return -EOPNOTSUPP.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang
---
arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c |
Let's assume cpuidle_ops exists but it doesn't implement the according
init member, current arm_cpuidle_init() will return success to its
caller, but in fact it should return -EOPNOTSUPP.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang
---
arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
10 matches
Mail list logo