Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Rename opp_node to np

On 14 June 2018 at 07:23, Viresh Kumar wrote: > The DT node passed here isn't necessarily an OPP node, as this routine > can also be used for cases where the "required-opps" property is present > directly in the device's node. Rename it. > > This also removes a stale comment. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Rename opp_node to np

On 14 June 2018 at 07:23, Viresh Kumar wrote: > The DT node passed here isn't necessarily an OPP node, as this routine > can also be used for cases where the "required-opps" property is present > directly in the device's node. Rename it. > > This also removes a stale comment. > > Signed-off-by:

[PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Rename opp_node to np

The DT node passed here isn't necessarily an OPP node, as this routine can also be used for cases where the "required-opps" property is present directly in the device's node. Rename it. This also removes a stale comment. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/base/power/domain.c | 7 +++

[PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Rename opp_node to np

The DT node passed here isn't necessarily an OPP node, as this routine can also be used for cases where the "required-opps" property is present directly in the device's node. Rename it. This also removes a stale comment. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/base/power/domain.c | 7 +++