On 29 April 2014 11:20, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> -> You are right. But 5440 cpufreq driver write an index number instead of
> clk divider value
> for change DVFS. And our another(will submit) also write an index number for
> changing DVFS.
> As you said, order of table shouldn't matter at all in
On 29 April 2014 11:20, Jonghwan Choi jhbird.c...@samsung.com wrote:
- You are right. But 5440 cpufreq driver write an index number instead of
clk divider value
for change DVFS. And our another(will submit) also write an index number for
changing DVFS.
As you said, order of table shouldn't
gmail.com [mailto:viresh.li...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Viresh Kumar
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 2:33 PM
> To: Jonghwan Choi
> Cc: open list; Rafael J. Wysocki; Len Brown
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: Use list_for_each_entry_reverse instead
> of list_for_each_entry
&g
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> Most of the cpufreq table is sorted in descending order.
Which part of kernel says that?
> But when cpufreq table is made from dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table,
> it is sorted in ascending order. So in some case to make cpufreq table
> with
Most of the cpufreq table is sorted in descending order.
But when cpufreq table is made from dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table,
it is sorted in ascending order. So in some case to make cpufreq table
with descending order it needs an extra work.
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi
---
Most of the cpufreq table is sorted in descending order.
But when cpufreq table is made from dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table,
it is sorted in ascending order. So in some case to make cpufreq table
with descending order it needs an extra work.
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi jhbird.c...@samsung.com
---
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Jonghwan Choi jhbird.c...@samsung.com wrote:
Most of the cpufreq table is sorted in descending order.
Which part of kernel says that?
But when cpufreq table is made from dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table,
it is sorted in ascending order. So in some case to make
: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 2:33 PM
To: Jonghwan Choi
Cc: open list; Rafael J. Wysocki; Len Brown
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: Use list_for_each_entry_reverse instead
of list_for_each_entry
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Jonghwan Choi jhbird.c...@samsung.com
wrote:
Most of the cpufreq
8 matches
Mail list logo
