Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "Revert "math64: New div64_u64_rem helper""

2013-09-04 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Wed, Sep 04 2013 at 12:11pm -0400, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. > > > > div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users. > > In the light of this discussion

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "Revert "math64: New div64_u64_rem helper""

2013-09-04 Thread Anatol Pomozov
Hi, On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. > > div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users. In the light of this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/30/417 we will have more users of div64_u64_rem

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert Revert math64: New div64_u64_rem helper

2013-09-04 Thread Anatol Pomozov
Hi, On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote: This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users. In the light of this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/30/417 we will have more users of

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert Revert math64: New div64_u64_rem helper

2013-09-04 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Wed, Sep 04 2013 at 12:11pm -0400, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote: This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "Revert "math64: New div64_u64_rem helper""

2013-08-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20 2013 at 4:09am -0400, > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > * Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > > This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. > > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert Revert math64: New div64_u64_rem helper

2013-08-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 20 2013 at 4:09am -0400, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Stanislaw Gruszka sgrus...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: This reverts commit

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "Revert "math64: New div64_u64_rem helper""

2013-08-20 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Tue, Aug 20 2013 at 4:09am -0400, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. > > > > > > div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "Revert "math64: New div64_u64_rem helper""

2013-08-20 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. > > > > div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users. > > > > But Device Mapper's I/O statistics support has a need for >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "Revert "math64: New div64_u64_rem helper""

2013-08-20 Thread Stanislaw Gruszka
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. > > div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users. > > But Device Mapper's I/O statistics support has a need for > div64_u64_rem; reintroduce this helper.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert Revert math64: New div64_u64_rem helper

2013-08-20 Thread Stanislaw Gruszka
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users. But Device Mapper's I/O statistics support has a need for div64_u64_rem; reintroduce this helper. This

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert Revert math64: New div64_u64_rem helper

2013-08-20 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Stanislaw Gruszka sgrus...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users. But Device Mapper's I/O statistics support has a

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert Revert math64: New div64_u64_rem helper

2013-08-20 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Tue, Aug 20 2013 at 4:09am -0400, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Stanislaw Gruszka sgrus...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. div64_u64_rem was removed because

[PATCH 1/2] Revert "Revert "math64: New div64_u64_rem helper""

2013-08-09 Thread Mike Snitzer
This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users. But Device Mapper's I/O statistics support has a need for div64_u64_rem; reintroduce this helper. Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: Frederic

[PATCH 1/2] Revert Revert math64: New div64_u64_rem helper

2013-08-09 Thread Mike Snitzer
This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308. div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users. But Device Mapper's I/O statistics support has a need for div64_u64_rem; reintroduce this helper. Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka