On Wed, Sep 04 2013 at 12:11pm -0400,
Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
> >
> > div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users.
>
> In the light of this discussion
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
>
> div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users.
In the light of this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/30/417 we
will have more users of div64_u64_rem
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote:
This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users.
In the light of this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/30/417 we
will have more users of
On Wed, Sep 04 2013 at 12:11pm -0400,
Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote:
This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users.
* Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20 2013 at 4:09am -0400,
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > > This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
> > > >
> > > >
* Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20 2013 at 4:09am -0400,
Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Stanislaw Gruszka sgrus...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
This reverts commit
On Tue, Aug 20 2013 at 4:09am -0400,
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
> > >
> > > div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other
* Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
> >
> > div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users.
> >
> > But Device Mapper's I/O statistics support has a need for
>
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
>
> div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users.
>
> But Device Mapper's I/O statistics support has a need for
> div64_u64_rem; reintroduce this helper.
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users.
But Device Mapper's I/O statistics support has a need for
div64_u64_rem; reintroduce this helper.
This
* Stanislaw Gruszka sgrus...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users.
But Device Mapper's I/O statistics support has a
On Tue, Aug 20 2013 at 4:09am -0400,
Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Stanislaw Gruszka sgrus...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
div64_u64_rem was removed because
This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users.
But Device Mapper's I/O statistics support has a need for
div64_u64_rem; reintroduce this helper.
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka
Cc: Frederic
This reverts commit f3002134158092178be81339ec5a22ff80e6c308.
div64_u64_rem was removed because there were no other users.
But Device Mapper's I/O statistics support has a need for
div64_u64_rem; reintroduce this helper.
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka
14 matches
Mail list logo