Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved"

2018-08-27 Thread Pasha Tatashin
On 8/23/18 2:25 PM, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote: > From: Masayoshi Mizuma > > commit 124049decbb1 ("x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into > memblock.reserved") breaks movable_node kernel option because it > changed the memory gap range to reserved memblock. So, the node > is marked as Normal zone

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved"

2018-08-27 Thread Pasha Tatashin
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:31 AM Masayoshi Mizuma wrote: > > Hi Pavel, > > I would appreciate if you could send the feedback for the patch. I will study it today. Pavel > > Thanks! > Masa > > On 08/24/2018 04:29 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 24-08-18 00:03:25, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > >> (C

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved"

2018-08-27 Thread Masayoshi Mizuma
Hi Pavel, I would appreciate if you could send the feedback for the patch. Thanks! Masa On 08/24/2018 04:29 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 24-08-18 00:03:25, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: >> (CCed related people) > > Fixup Pavel email. > >> >> Hi Mizuma-san, >> >> Thank you for the report. >> The m

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved"

2018-08-24 Thread Michal Hocko
On Fri 24-08-18 00:03:25, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > (CCed related people) Fixup Pavel email. > > Hi Mizuma-san, > > Thank you for the report. > The mentioned patch was created based on feedbacks from reviewers/maintainers, > so I'd like to hear from them about how we should handle the issue. >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved"

2018-08-23 Thread Naoya Horiguchi
(CCed related people) Hi Mizuma-san, Thank you for the report. The mentioned patch was created based on feedbacks from reviewers/maintainers, so I'd like to hear from them about how we should handle the issue. And one note is that there is a follow-up patch for "x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM reg

[PATCH 1/2] Revert "x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved"

2018-08-23 Thread Masayoshi Mizuma
From: Masayoshi Mizuma commit 124049decbb1 ("x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved") breaks movable_node kernel option because it changed the memory gap range to reserved memblock. So, the node is marked as Normal zone even if the SRAT has Hot plaggable affinity. ==