Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi/pmic: modify the pen function signature to take bit field

On 06/11/2016 03:22 PM, Bin Gao wrote: > Issue description: On some pmics, the policy enable for thermal alerts > refers to different bit fields of the same registers, whereas on other > pmics, the policy enable refers to the same bit field on different > registers. Previous implementation did not

Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi/pmic: modify the pen function signature to take bit field

On 06/11/2016 03:22 PM, Bin Gao wrote: > Issue description: On some pmics, the policy enable for thermal alerts > refers to different bit fields of the same registers, whereas on other > pmics, the policy enable refers to the same bit field on different > registers. Previous implementation did not

[PATCH 1/2] acpi/pmic: modify the pen function signature to take bit field

Issue description: On some pmics, the policy enable for thermal alerts refers to different bit fields of the same registers, whereas on other pmics, the policy enable refers to the same bit field on different registers. Previous implementation did not provide the flexibility for supporting the

[PATCH 1/2] acpi/pmic: modify the pen function signature to take bit field

Issue description: On some pmics, the policy enable for thermal alerts refers to different bit fields of the same registers, whereas on other pmics, the policy enable refers to the same bit field on different registers. Previous implementation did not provide the flexibility for supporting the