Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Allow light-weight tear down on CPU offline operation

2019-02-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:51 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:41 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > > The cpufreq core doesn't remove the cpufreq policy anymore on CPU > > offline operation, rather that happens when the CPU device gets > > unregistered from the kernel. This

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Allow light-weight tear down on CPU offline operation

2019-02-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:41 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > The cpufreq core doesn't remove the cpufreq policy anymore on CPU > offline operation, rather that happens when the CPU device gets > unregistered from the kernel. This allows faster recovery when the CPU > comes back online. This is also

[PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Allow light-weight tear down on CPU offline operation

2019-02-11 Thread Viresh Kumar
The cpufreq core doesn't remove the cpufreq policy anymore on CPU offline operation, rather that happens when the CPU device gets unregistered from the kernel. This allows faster recovery when the CPU comes back online. This is also very useful during system wide suspend/resume where we offline