On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 09:36:18PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> +Kees
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 9:27 PM Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 3:42 AM Christian Brauner
> > wrote:
> > > Hm, still pondering whether having one unsigned int argument passed
> > > through registers that
Christian Brauner writes:
> This adds the clone6 system call.
>
> As mentioned several times already (cf. [7], [8]) here's the promised
> patchset for clone6().
>
> We recently merged the CLONE_PIDFD patchset (cf. [1]). It took the last
> free flag from clone().
>
> Independent of the
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 3:08 AM Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 12:27:08PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 3:42 AM Christian Brauner
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hm, still pondering whether having one unsigned int argument passed
> > > through registers
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 12:27:08PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 3:42 AM Christian Brauner
> wrote:
> >
> > Hm, still pondering whether having one unsigned int argument passed
> > through registers that captures all the flags from the old clone() would
> > be a good
+Kees
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 9:27 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 3:42 AM Christian Brauner
> wrote:
> > Hm, still pondering whether having one unsigned int argument passed
> > through registers that captures all the flags from the old clone() would
> > be a good idea.
>
>
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 3:42 AM Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> Hm, still pondering whether having one unsigned int argument passed
> through registers that captures all the flags from the old clone() would
> be a good idea.
That sounds like a reasonable thing to do.
Maybe we could continue to
Moin,
Wasn't near a computer yesterday so sorry for the late reply. :) I
(I should note that this was supposed to be prefixed with RFC. But *shrug*.)
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 09:50:32AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 3:27 AM Christian Brauner
> wrote:
> >
> > This adds
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 3:27 AM Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> This adds the clone6 system call.
No, this is not acceptable.
> + struct clone6_args args = {
First of all, we don't pass in "clone6_args" to the actual implementation.
Passing in lots of args as a structure is fine. But it
This adds the clone6 system call.
As mentioned several times already (cf. [7], [8]) here's the promised
patchset for clone6().
We recently merged the CLONE_PIDFD patchset (cf. [1]). It took the last
free flag from clone().
Independent of the CLONE_PIDFD patchset a time namespace has been
9 matches
Mail list logo
