On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:28:21 -0700 Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:21 PM Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:54:55 -0700 Nick Desaulniers
> > wrote:
> >
> > > LLVM changed the expected function signature for
> > > llvm_gcda_emit_function() in the clang-11
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:21 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:54:55 -0700 Nick Desaulniers
> wrote:
>
> > LLVM changed the expected function signature for
> > llvm_gcda_emit_function() in the clang-11 release. Users of clang-11 or
> > newer may have noticed their kernels
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:54:55 -0700 Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
> LLVM changed the expected function signature for
> llvm_gcda_emit_function() in the clang-11 release. Users of clang-11 or
> newer may have noticed their kernels producing invalid coverage
> information:
>
> $ llvm-cov gcov -a -c -u
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:54:55AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> LLVM changed the expected function signature for
> llvm_gcda_emit_function() in the clang-11 release. Users of clang-11 or
> newer may have noticed their kernels producing invalid coverage
> information:
>
> $ llvm-cov gcov -a
LLVM changed the expected function signature for
llvm_gcda_emit_function() in the clang-11 release. Users of clang-11 or
newer may have noticed their kernels producing invalid coverage
information:
$ llvm-cov gcov -a -c -u -f -b .gcda -- gcno=.gcno
1 : checksum mismatch, \
(, ) != (, )
2
5 matches
Mail list logo