On 03/05/2014 at 11:11:50 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote :
> On 02/05/14 23:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >Found using smatch:
> >drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c:719 iio_device_add_info_mask_type() error:
> >buffer overflow 'iio_chan_info_postfix' 17 <= 63
> >
> >It was probably never hit because
On 02/05/14 23:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Found using smatch:
drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c:719 iio_device_add_info_mask_type() error:
buffer overflow 'iio_chan_info_postfix' 17 <= 63
It was probably never hit because the info_mask_* members are filled by using
the BIT() macro with values
On 02/05/14 23:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Found using smatch:
drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c:719 iio_device_add_info_mask_type() error:
buffer overflow 'iio_chan_info_postfix' 17 = 63
It was probably never hit because the info_mask_* members are filled by using
the BIT() macro with values
On 03/05/2014 at 11:11:50 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote :
On 02/05/14 23:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Found using smatch:
drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c:719 iio_device_add_info_mask_type() error:
buffer overflow 'iio_chan_info_postfix' 17 = 63
It was probably never hit because the
Found using smatch:
drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c:719 iio_device_add_info_mask_type() error:
buffer overflow 'iio_chan_info_postfix' 17 <= 63
It was probably never hit because the info_mask_* members are filled by using
the BIT() macro with values from the iio_chan_info_enum enum that also
Found using smatch:
drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c:719 iio_device_add_info_mask_type() error:
buffer overflow 'iio_chan_info_postfix' 17 = 63
It was probably never hit because the info_mask_* members are filled by using
the BIT() macro with values from the iio_chan_info_enum enum that also serve
6 matches
Mail list logo