On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, micky wrote:
> On 06/18/2014 04:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >
> >>On 16 June 2014 14:20, Lee Jones wrote:
> From: Micky Ching
>
> rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are
> placed in
On 06/18/2014 04:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 16 June 2014 14:20, Lee Jones wrote:
From: Micky Ching
rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are
placed in one fix function. We need map/unmap dma in different place(for
mmc
On 06/18/2014 04:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 16 June 2014 14:20, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Micky Ching micky_ch...@realsil.com.cn
rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are
placed in one fix function. We
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, micky wrote:
On 06/18/2014 04:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 16 June 2014 14:20, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Micky Ching micky_ch...@realsil.com.cn
rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 16 June 2014 14:20, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> From: Micky Ching
> >>
> >> rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are
> >> placed in one fix function. We need map/unmap dma in different place(for
> >> mmc async driver), so
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 16 June 2014 14:20, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Micky Ching micky_ch...@realsil.com.cn
rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are
placed in one fix function. We need map/unmap dma in different
On 06/16/2014 08:20 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
I don't see any glaring issues with this patch. Does it rely on the
first patch, or vise versa, or can it just be applied?
Hi Jones,
[PATCH 2/2] need function defined in [PATCH 1/2],
so we provide interface in [mfd] and called in [mmc].
Best Regards.
On 16 June 2014 14:20, Lee Jones wrote:
>> From: Micky Ching
>>
>> rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are
>> placed in one fix function. We need map/unmap dma in different place(for
>> mmc async driver), so add three function for dma map, dma transfer and
>> dma
> From: Micky Ching
>
> rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are
> placed in one fix function. We need map/unmap dma in different place(for
> mmc async driver), so add three function for dma map, dma transfer and
> dma unmap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Micky Ching
> ---
From: Micky Ching micky_ch...@realsil.com.cn
rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are
placed in one fix function. We need map/unmap dma in different place(for
mmc async driver), so add three function for dma map, dma transfer and
dma unmap.
Signed-off-by:
On 16 June 2014 14:20, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Micky Ching micky_ch...@realsil.com.cn
rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are
placed in one fix function. We need map/unmap dma in different place(for
mmc async driver), so add three function
On 06/16/2014 08:20 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
I don't see any glaring issues with this patch. Does it rely on the
first patch, or vise versa, or can it just be applied?
Hi Jones,
[PATCH 2/2] need function defined in [PATCH 1/2],
so we provide interface in [mfd] and called in [mmc].
Best Regards.
From: Micky Ching
rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are
placed in one fix function. We need map/unmap dma in different place(for
mmc async driver), so add three function for dma map, dma transfer and
dma unmap.
Signed-off-by: Micky Ching
---
From: Micky Ching micky_ch...@realsil.com.cn
rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are
placed in one fix function. We need map/unmap dma in different place(for
mmc async driver), so add three function for dma map, dma transfer and
dma unmap.
Signed-off-by: Micky
14 matches
Mail list logo