Actually thinking about this a little more I don't think we should put
this in. Instead this loop should be moved up to fs/read_write.c because
these are checks that we want for all filesystems/drivers that use
vectored I/O. We'll still need tiny loops to calculate the total
I/O length for now
Actually thinking about this a little more I don't think we should put
this in. Instead this loop should be moved up to fs/read_write.c because
these are checks that we want for all filesystems/drivers that use
vectored I/O. We'll still need tiny loops to calculate the total
I/O length for now
Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:57:53AM +0300, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
>> I realy don't want to be annoying by sending this patcheset over and over
>> again. If anyone think this patch is realy cappy, please comment what
>> exectly is bad. Thank you.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:57:53AM +0300, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
> I realy don't want to be annoying by sending this patcheset over and over
> again. If anyone think this patch is realy cappy, please comment what
> exectly is bad. Thank you.
Doesn't seem like a bad idea.
>
> Changes:
> -
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:57:53AM +0300, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
> +/*
> + * Performs necessary checks before doing a write
> + *
> + * Adjust number of segments and amount of bytes to write.
> + * Returns appropriate error code that caller should return or
> + * zero in case that write should be
I realy don't want to be annoying by sending this patcheset over and over
again. If anyone think this patch is realy cappy, please comment what
exectly is bad. Thank you.
Changes:
- patch was split in two patches.
- comments added. I think now it is clearly describe things.
- make
I realy don't want to be annoying by sending this patcheset over and over
again. If anyone think this patch is realy cappy, please comment what
exectly is bad. Thank you.
Changes:
- patch was split in two patches.
- comments added. I think now it is clearly describe things.
- make
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:57:53AM +0300, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
+/*
+ * Performs necessary checks before doing a write
+ *
+ * Adjust number of segments and amount of bytes to write.
+ * Returns appropriate error code that caller should return or
+ * zero in case that write should be
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:57:53AM +0300, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
I realy don't want to be annoying by sending this patcheset over and over
again. If anyone think this patch is realy cappy, please comment what
exectly is bad. Thank you.
Doesn't seem like a bad idea.
Changes:
- patch
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:57:53AM +0300, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
I realy don't want to be annoying by sending this patcheset over and over
again. If anyone think this patch is realy cappy, please comment what
exectly is bad. Thank you.
Doesn't seem
10 matches
Mail list logo