Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 02:29 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >>
> >> Your description from patch 0 should be here.
> > Does it sound better ?
> >
> >>
> >>> - if ((br_privilege != 7) && (br_privilege != 0))
> >>> - return -1;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (br_privilege)
> >>> +
On 05/22/2013 02:29 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>> Your description from patch 0 should be here.
> Does it sound better ?
>
>>
>>> - if ((br_privilege != 7) && (br_privilege != 0))
>>> - return -1;
>>> +
>>> + if (br_privilege)
>>> + pr_info("BHRB privilege state filter
>
> Your description from patch 0 should be here.
>
Sure, will bring it here.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
>> index f7d1c4f..8ed323d 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
>> @@ -525,16 +525,17
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 11:17 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Completely ignore BHRB privilege state filter request as we are
> already configuring MMCRA register with privilege state filtering
> attribute for the accompanying PMU event. This would help achieve
> cleaner user space interaction for
Completely ignore BHRB privilege state filter request as we are
already configuring MMCRA register with privilege state filtering
attribute for the accompanying PMU event. This would help achieve
cleaner user space interaction for BHRB.
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual
---
arch/powerpc/perf/powe
5 matches
Mail list logo
