Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86,syscall: Add syscall_in_syscall to test whether we're in a syscall

2014-06-02 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On May 30, 2014 2:58 PM, "Andy Lutomirski" wrote: > > syscall_in_syscall will return true if we're in a real syscall and > will return false if we're not in a syscall. If we're in a bad > syscall, the return value can vary. > > The idea is to use this to come up with a much simpler replacement >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86,syscall: Add syscall_in_syscall to test whether we're in a syscall

2014-06-02 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On May 30, 2014 2:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: syscall_in_syscall will return true if we're in a real syscall and will return false if we're not in a syscall. If we're in a bad syscall, the return value can vary. The idea is to use this to come up with a much simpler

[PATCH 1/2] x86,syscall: Add syscall_in_syscall to test whether we're in a syscall

2014-05-30 Thread Andy Lutomirski
syscall_in_syscall will return true if we're in a real syscall and will return false if we're not in a syscall. If we're in a bad syscall, the return value can vary. The idea is to use this to come up with a much simpler replacement for syscall auditing. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski ---

[PATCH 1/2] x86,syscall: Add syscall_in_syscall to test whether we're in a syscall

2014-05-30 Thread Andy Lutomirski
syscall_in_syscall will return true if we're in a real syscall and will return false if we're not in a syscall. If we're in a bad syscall, the return value can vary. The idea is to use this to come up with a much simpler replacement for syscall auditing. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski