> -Original Message-
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@suse.de]
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 1:27 PM
> To: Ghannam, Yazen
...
> > static void
> > -__log_error(unsigned int bank, bool deferred_err, bool threshold_err,
> > u64 misc)
> > +__log_error(unsigned
> -Original Message-
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@suse.de]
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 1:27 PM
> To: Ghannam, Yazen
...
> > static void
> > -__log_error(unsigned int bank, bool deferred_err, bool threshold_err,
> > u64 misc)
> > +__log_error(unsigned int bank, bool
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:29:30PM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam
>
> We have support for the new SMCA MCA_DE{STAT,ADDR} registers in Linux. So
> we've used these registers in place of MCA_{STATUS,ADDR} on SMCA systems.
> However, the guidance for
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:29:30PM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam
>
> We have support for the new SMCA MCA_DE{STAT,ADDR} registers in Linux. So
> we've used these registers in place of MCA_{STATUS,ADDR} on SMCA systems.
> However, the guidance for current implementations of
From: Yazen Ghannam
We have support for the new SMCA MCA_DE{STAT,ADDR} registers in Linux. So
we've used these registers in place of MCA_{STATUS,ADDR} on SMCA systems.
However, the guidance for current implementations of SMCA is to continue
using MCA_{STATUS,ADDR} and to
From: Yazen Ghannam
We have support for the new SMCA MCA_DE{STAT,ADDR} registers in Linux. So
we've used these registers in place of MCA_{STATUS,ADDR} on SMCA systems.
However, the guidance for current implementations of SMCA is to continue
using MCA_{STATUS,ADDR} and to use MCA_DE{STAT,ADDR}
6 matches
Mail list logo