Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: use memblock_alloc_range() or memblock_alloc_base()

2014-08-28 Thread Akinobu Mita
2014-08-28 5:53 GMT+09:00 Andrew Morton : > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:56:02 +0900 Akinobu Mita > wrote: > >> Replace memblock_find_in_range() and memblock_reserve() with >> memblock_alloc_range() or memblock_alloc_base(). > > Please spend a little more time preparing the changelogs? OK, I'll be car

Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: use memblock_alloc_range() or memblock_alloc_base()

2014-08-27 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:56:02 +0900 Akinobu Mita wrote: > Replace memblock_find_in_range() and memblock_reserve() with > memblock_alloc_range() or memblock_alloc_base(). Please spend a little more time preparing the changelogs? Why are we making this change? Because memblock_alloc_range() is eq

[PATCH 1/2] x86: use memblock_alloc_range() or memblock_alloc_base()

2014-08-24 Thread Akinobu Mita
Replace memblock_find_in_range() and memblock_reserve() with memblock_alloc_range() or memblock_alloc_base(). Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: x...@kernel.org Cc: linux...@kvack.org --- arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c | 6 +++--- arch/x86