On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 09:29 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:48:50AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > ---
> >
> > It isn't obvious where kprobes patches should go, is anyone "the"
> > maintainer?
> > Instead I've just sent this to everyone who'd touched the
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:48:50AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> ---
>
> It isn't obvious where kprobes patches should go, is anyone "the" maintainer?
> Instead I've just sent this to everyone who'd touched the code lately, or
> might be otherwise interested.
There isn't a single maintainer
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:48:50AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Currently jprobe.entry is a kprobe_opcode_t *, but that's a lie. On some
> platforms it doesn't point to an opcode at all, it points to a function
> descriptor.
>
> It's really a pointer to something that the arch code can turn
Currently jprobe.entry is a kprobe_opcode_t *, but that's a lie. On some
platforms it doesn't point to an opcode at all, it points to a function
descriptor.
It's really a pointer to something that the arch code can turn into a
function entry point. And that's what actually happens, none of the
Currently jprobe.entry is a kprobe_opcode_t *, but that's a lie. On some
platforms it doesn't point to an opcode at all, it points to a function
descriptor.
It's really a pointer to something that the arch code can turn into a
function entry point. And that's what actually happens, none of the
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:48:50AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Currently jprobe.entry is a kprobe_opcode_t *, but that's a lie. On some
platforms it doesn't point to an opcode at all, it points to a function
descriptor.
It's really a pointer to something that the arch code can turn into a
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:48:50AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
---
It isn't obvious where kprobes patches should go, is anyone the maintainer?
Instead I've just sent this to everyone who'd touched the code lately, or
might be otherwise interested.
There isn't a single maintainer for the
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 09:29 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:48:50AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
---
It isn't obvious where kprobes patches should go, is anyone the
maintainer?
Instead I've just sent this to everyone who'd touched the code lately,
8 matches
Mail list logo
