On 10/05/2017 03:58 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h
>> should be included. One thing it does is to break the RT build.
>>
>> Cc: Stefano Stabellini
On 10/05/2017 03:58 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h
>> should be included. One thing it does is to break the RT build.
>>
>> Cc: Stefano Stabellini
>> Cc:
On 2017-10-05 12:58:32 [-0700], Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Let me know if you want this patch to go via the xen tree.
Yes, please.
Sebastian
On 2017-10-05 12:58:32 [-0700], Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Let me know if you want this patch to go via the xen tree.
Yes, please.
Sebastian
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h
> should be included. One thing it does is to break the RT build.
>
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini
> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h
> should be included. One thing it does is to break the RT build.
>
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini
> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
6 matches
Mail list logo