Hi,
On 01.12.2014 10:04, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sun 30-11-14 00:37:36, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>> In fanotify_mark_remove_from_mask() a mark is destroyed if only one of both
>> bitmasks (mask or ignored_mask) of a mark is cleared. However the other mask
>> may still be set and contain information
On Sun 30-11-14 00:37:36, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> In fanotify_mark_remove_from_mask() a mark is destroyed if only one of both
> bitmasks (mask or ignored_mask) of a mark is cleared. However the other mask
> may still be set and contain information that should not be lost. Thus only
> destroy a
Hi,
On 01.12.2014 10:04, Jan Kara wrote:
On Sun 30-11-14 00:37:36, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
In fanotify_mark_remove_from_mask() a mark is destroyed if only one of both
bitmasks (mask or ignored_mask) of a mark is cleared. However the other mask
may still be set and contain information that
On Sun 30-11-14 00:37:36, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
In fanotify_mark_remove_from_mask() a mark is destroyed if only one of both
bitmasks (mask or ignored_mask) of a mark is cleared. However the other mask
may still be set and contain information that should not be lost. Thus only
destroy a mark
In fanotify_mark_remove_from_mask() a mark is destroyed if only one of both
bitmasks (mask or ignored_mask) of a mark is cleared. However the other mask
may still be set and contain information that should not be lost. Thus only
destroy a mark if both masks are cleared.
Signed-off-by: Lino
In fanotify_mark_remove_from_mask() a mark is destroyed if only one of both
bitmasks (mask or ignored_mask) of a mark is cleared. However the other mask
may still be set and contain information that should not be lost. Thus only
destroy a mark if both masks are cleared.
Signed-off-by: Lino
6 matches
Mail list logo