On Sun, 20 Sep 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >
> >> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained
> >> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings use
Hi Lee,
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
>> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained
>> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the
>> parent regulator names for the supply regulator
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained
> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the
> parent regulator names for the supply regulator property. This causes
> some confusion when we actually use it in
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained
> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the
> parent regulator names for the supply regulator property. This causes
> some confusion when we
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained
> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the
> parent regulator names for the supply regulator property. This causes
> some confusion when we
The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained
to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the
parent regulator names for the supply regulator property. This causes
some confusion when we actually use it in the dts:
axp221 {
/* self
6 matches
Mail list logo
