>
> Now I'm confused, isn't this the same patch I picked this morning from
> you and is already applied in chrome-platform for-next?
>
Sorry, I didn't see that it was already applied in for-next. Just ignore
this patch and assume that the next two in this series are based
off the current state of
Hi Nick,
Missatge de Nick Crews del dia dv., 5 d’abr.
2019 a les 22:09:
>
> The current API for the wilco EC mailbox interface is bad.
>
> It assumes that most messages sent to the EC follow a similar structure,
> with a command byte in MBOX[0], followed by a junk byte, followed by
> actual
The current API for the wilco EC mailbox interface is bad.
It assumes that most messages sent to the EC follow a similar structure,
with a command byte in MBOX[0], followed by a junk byte, followed by
actual data. This doesn't happen in several cases, such as setting the
RTC time, using the raw
3 matches
Mail list logo