Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

From: Bjorn Andersson Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 22:49:22 -0700 > On Mon 27 Mar 16:04 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Bjorn Andersson >> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:58:37 -0700 >> >> > I'm sorry, but I can't figure out how to

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

From: Bjorn Andersson Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 22:49:22 -0700 > On Mon 27 Mar 16:04 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Bjorn Andersson >> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:58:37 -0700 >> >> > I'm sorry, but I can't figure out how to reproduce this. >> >> All of my builds are "make allmodconfig"

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

On Mon 27 Mar 16:04 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > From: Bjorn Andersson > Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:58:37 -0700 > > > I'm sorry, but I can't figure out how to reproduce this. > > All of my builds are "make allmodconfig" so it should be easy to reproduce. Thanks,

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

On Mon 27 Mar 16:04 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > From: Bjorn Andersson > Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:58:37 -0700 > > > I'm sorry, but I can't figure out how to reproduce this. > > All of my builds are "make allmodconfig" so it should be easy to reproduce. Thanks, turns out that while it was

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

From: Bjorn Andersson Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:58:37 -0700 > I'm sorry, but I can't figure out how to reproduce this. All of my builds are "make allmodconfig" so it should be easy to reproduce.

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

From: Bjorn Andersson Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:58:37 -0700 > I'm sorry, but I can't figure out how to reproduce this. All of my builds are "make allmodconfig" so it should be easy to reproduce.

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

On Thu 23 Mar 16:56 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > From: Bjorn Andersson > Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:57:33 -0700 > > > On Wed 22 Mar 11:44 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > > > >> From: Bjorn Andersson > >> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

On Thu 23 Mar 16:56 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > From: Bjorn Andersson > Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:57:33 -0700 > > > On Wed 22 Mar 11:44 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > > > >> From: Bjorn Andersson > >> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700 > >> > >> What is the status of the Kconfig

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

From: Bjorn Andersson Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:57:33 -0700 > On Wed 22 Mar 11:44 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Bjorn Andersson >> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700 >> >> What is the status of the Kconfig dependency fix

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

From: Bjorn Andersson Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:57:33 -0700 > On Wed 22 Mar 11:44 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Bjorn Andersson >> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700 >> >> What is the status of the Kconfig dependency fix and how will I be >> getting it? >> > > There are two

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

From: Marcel Holtmann Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:23:15 +0100 > Hi Dave, > >>> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD >>> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol >>> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms.

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

From: Marcel Holtmann Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:23:15 +0100 > Hi Dave, > >>> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD >>> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol >>> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. >>> >>> As the new

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

On Wed 22 Mar 11:44 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > From: Bjorn Andersson > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700 > > > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD > > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol > >

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

On Wed 22 Mar 11:44 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > From: Bjorn Andersson > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700 > > > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD > > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol > > support found in the 820 and

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:44:39AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Bjorn Andersson > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700 > > > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD > > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:44:39AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Bjorn Andersson > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700 > > > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD > > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol > > support found in

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:35:42PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol > support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. > > As the new (RPMSG-based) and old

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:35:42PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol > support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. > > As the new (RPMSG-based) and old

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

Hi Dave, >> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD >> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol >> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. >> >> As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually >> exclusive we

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

Hi Dave, >> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD >> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol >> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. >> >> As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually >> exclusive we

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

From: Bjorn Andersson Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700 > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol > support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. > > As the

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

From: Bjorn Andersson Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700 > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol > support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. > > As the new (RPMSG-based) and old

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

Marcel Holtmann writes: >> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD >> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol >> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. >> >> As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

Marcel Holtmann writes: >> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD >> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol >> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. >> >> As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

Hi Bjorn, > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol > support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. > > As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually > exclusive we have

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

Hi Bjorn, > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol > support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. > > As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually > exclusive we have

[PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually exclusive we have to change all client

[PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg

By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually exclusive we have to change all client