Hi Lars
I think you are right. The other patches on the set are still valid though
Thanks!
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 01/21/2015 04:53 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>>
>> If there is more than one spi device on a device tree, the second one
>> will
On 01/21/2015 04:53 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
If there is more than one spi device on a device tree, the second one
will fail to probe due to a duplicated bus_num.
> [...]
This should already be fixed. See commit 4b153a2137c5 ("spi: xilinx: Use
pdev->id instead of pdev->dev.id for
If there is more than one spi device on a device tree, the second one
will fail to probe due to a duplicated bus_num.
This patch uses automatic bus number if the device is deined on a device
tree.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
---
drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4
Hi Lars
I think you are right. The other patches on the set are still valid though
Thanks!
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen l...@metafoo.de wrote:
On 01/21/2015 04:53 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
If there is more than one spi device on a device tree, the second one
If there is more than one spi device on a device tree, the second one
will fail to probe due to a duplicated bus_num.
This patch uses automatic bus number if the device is deined on a device
tree.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado ricardo.riba...@gmail.com
---
drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c | 5
On 01/21/2015 04:53 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
If there is more than one spi device on a device tree, the second one
will fail to probe due to a duplicated bus_num.
[...]
This should already be fixed. See commit 4b153a2137c5 (spi: xilinx: Use
pdev-id instead of pdev-dev.id for the
6 matches
Mail list logo