Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add clk_syscon as an optional one

2016-09-02 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Rob, > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:02:56PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: >>> We introduced soc-ctl-syscon to do several things, for instance, update

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add clk_syscon as an optional one

2016-09-02 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Rob, > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:02:56PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: >>> We introduced soc-ctl-syscon to do several things, for instance, update >>> baseclk or update clkmul, etc. In

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add clk_syscon as an optional one

2016-09-02 Thread Doug Anderson
Rob, On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:02:56PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: >> We introduced soc-ctl-syscon to do several things, for instance, update >> baseclk or update clkmul, etc. In odrder to access this physical block, >> we need

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add clk_syscon as an optional one

2016-09-02 Thread Doug Anderson
Rob, On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:02:56PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: >> We introduced soc-ctl-syscon to do several things, for instance, update >> baseclk or update clkmul, etc. In odrder to access this physical block, >> we need to explicitly

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add clk_syscon as an optional one

2016-09-02 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:02:56PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: > We introduced soc-ctl-syscon to do several things, for instance, update > baseclk or update clkmul, etc. In odrder to access this physical block, > we need to explicitly enable its clock. Currently we don't control this > clock as we

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add clk_syscon as an optional one

2016-09-02 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:02:56PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: > We introduced soc-ctl-syscon to do several things, for instance, update > baseclk or update clkmul, etc. In odrder to access this physical block, > we need to explicitly enable its clock. Currently we don't control this > clock as we

[PATCH 1/4] Documentation: mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add clk_syscon as an optional one

2016-08-29 Thread Shawn Lin
We introduced soc-ctl-syscon to do several things, for instance, update baseclk or update clkmul, etc. In odrder to access this physical block, we need to explicitly enable its clock. Currently we don't control this clock as we always add a CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag for it to indicate that we will

[PATCH 1/4] Documentation: mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add clk_syscon as an optional one

2016-08-29 Thread Shawn Lin
We introduced soc-ctl-syscon to do several things, for instance, update baseclk or update clkmul, etc. In odrder to access this physical block, we need to explicitly enable its clock. Currently we don't control this clock as we always add a CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag for it to indicate that we will