From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfie...@redhat.com>
Trivial refactoring, no change in behavior.
Not really necessary, a separate function for the inner loop just seems
a little nicer to me.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@redhat.com>
---
kernel/kthread.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index bfbfa481be3a..4217fded891a 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -578,6 +578,24 @@ int kthread_stop(struct task_struct *k)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_stop);
+void kthread_do_work(void)
+{
+ spin_lock(&kthread_create_lock);
+ while (!list_empty(&kthread_create_list)) {
+ struct kthread_create_info *create;
+
+ create = list_entry(kthread_create_list.next,
+ struct kthread_create_info, list);
+ list_del_init(&create->list);
+ spin_unlock(&kthread_create_lock);
+
+ create_kthread(create);
+
+ spin_lock(&kthread_create_lock);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&kthread_create_lock);
+}
+
int kthreadd(void *unused)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
@@ -597,20 +615,7 @@ int kthreadd(void *unused)
schedule();
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- spin_lock(&kthread_create_lock);
- while (!list_empty(&kthread_create_list)) {
- struct kthread_create_info *create;
-
- create = list_entry(kthread_create_list.next,
- struct kthread_create_info, list);
- list_del_init(&create->list);
- spin_unlock(&kthread_create_lock);
-
- create_kthread(create);
-
- spin_lock(&kthread_create_lock);
- }
- spin_unlock(&kthread_create_lock);
+ kthread_do_work();
}
return 0;
--
2.26.2
