On Tuesday 05 January 2016 12:37:50 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 28 December 2015 23:27:17 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 28 December 2015 13:01:22 Frank Rowand wrote:
> > >
> > > Patch 2/5 copies the value from ATAG_REVISION into the fdt "/revision"
> > > property.
> > >
> > > If the use
On Monday 28 December 2015 23:27:17 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 28 December 2015 13:01:22 Frank Rowand wrote:
> >
> > Patch 2/5 copies the value from ATAG_REVISION into the fdt "/revision"
> > property.
> >
> > If the use of /revision is limited to being a location to hold an ATAG
> > value
On Tuesday 05 January 2016 12:37:50 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 28 December 2015 23:27:17 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 28 December 2015 13:01:22 Frank Rowand wrote:
> > >
> > > Patch 2/5 copies the value from ATAG_REVISION into the fdt "/revision"
> > > property.
> > >
> > > If the use
On Monday 28 December 2015 23:27:17 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 28 December 2015 13:01:22 Frank Rowand wrote:
> >
> > Patch 2/5 copies the value from ATAG_REVISION into the fdt "/revision"
> > property.
> >
> > If the use of /revision is limited to being a location to hold an ATAG
> > value
On Monday 28 December 2015 13:01:22 Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> Patch 2/5 copies the value from ATAG_REVISION into the fdt "/revision"
> property.
>
> If the use of /revision is limited to being a location to hold an ATAG
> value to pass to the global variable system_rev, then it would make
> sense
Adding devicetree-spec, and commenting below.
On 12/24/2015 11:02 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 06 July 2015 22:26:09 Pali Rohár wrote:
>> With this patch "/revision" DT entry is used to set global system_rev
>> variable. DT "/revision" is expected to be u32 numeric value.
>>
>> TODO: add
On Monday 28 December 2015 13:01:22 Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> Patch 2/5 copies the value from ATAG_REVISION into the fdt "/revision"
> property.
>
> If the use of /revision is limited to being a location to hold an ATAG
> value to pass to the global variable system_rev, then it would make
> sense
Adding devicetree-spec, and commenting below.
On 12/24/2015 11:02 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 06 July 2015 22:26:09 Pali Rohár wrote:
>> With this patch "/revision" DT entry is used to set global system_rev
>> variable. DT "/revision" is expected to be u32 numeric value.
>>
>> TODO: add
On Monday 06 July 2015 22:26:09 Pali Rohár wrote:
> With this patch "/revision" DT entry is used to set global system_rev
> variable. DT "/revision" is expected to be u32 numeric value.
>
> TODO: add documentation
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c | 12
On Monday 06 July 2015 22:26:09 Pali Rohár wrote:
> With this patch "/revision" DT entry is used to set global system_rev
> variable. DT "/revision" is expected to be u32 numeric value.
>
> TODO: add documentation
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
>
With this patch "/revision" DT entry is used to set global system_rev
variable. DT "/revision" is expected to be u32 numeric value.
TODO: add documentation
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
---
arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
With this patch /revision DT entry is used to set global system_rev
variable. DT /revision is expected to be u32 numeric value.
TODO: add documentation
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2
12 matches
Mail list logo