On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:37:11PM +0800, Li Fei wrote:
>
> Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
> is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
> value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
> pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case.
Oh, that is
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:37:11PM +0800, Li Fei wrote:
Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case.
Oh, that is a
Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case.
Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng
Signed-off-by: Li Fei
---
Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case.
Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Li Fei
4 matches
Mail list logo