Re: [PATCH 1/5] regmap: irq: call pm_runtime_put in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case

2013-02-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:37:11PM +0800, Li Fei wrote: > > Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count > is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct > value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call > pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case. Oh, that is

Re: [PATCH 1/5] regmap: irq: call pm_runtime_put in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case

2013-02-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:37:11PM +0800, Li Fei wrote: Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case. Oh, that is a

[PATCH 1/5] regmap: irq: call pm_runtime_put in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case

2013-02-27 Thread Li Fei
Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case. Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng Signed-off-by: Li Fei ---

[PATCH 1/5] regmap: irq: call pm_runtime_put in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case

2013-02-27 Thread Li Fei
Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case. Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com Signed-off-by: Li Fei