Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-18 Thread Robert Hancock
Andi Kleen wrote: With just this patch you will have this problem. You need either the patch to disable decode during BAR sizing, Isn't that one already merged? I remember the BAR decoding patch did help with at least one of the original failures (there were multiple ones iirc0) I believe

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-18 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:52:14PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] > >>Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Tested-by: Andi

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-18 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:52:14PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: Andi Kleen wrote: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tested-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-18 Thread Robert Hancock
Andi Kleen wrote: With just this patch you will have this problem. You need either the patch to disable decode during BAR sizing, Isn't that one already merged? I remember the BAR decoding patch did help with at least one of the original failures (there were multiple ones iirc0) I believe

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-17 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > linus already apply the the patch to "use MMCONFIG for extended config > space only" to mainline. the last two near 2.6.25-rc1. > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=a0ca9909609470ad779b9b9cc68ce96e975afff7

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-17 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote: > From: Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This path adds validation of the MMCONFIG table against the ACPI reserved > motherboard resources. If the MMCONFIG table is found to be reserved in > ACPI, we don't bother checking the E820 table. The PCI

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-17 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote: From: Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] This path adds validation of the MMCONFIG table against the ACPI reserved motherboard resources. If the MMCONFIG table is found to be reserved in ACPI, we don't bother checking the E820 table. The PCI Express

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-17 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: linus already apply the the patch to use MMCONFIG for extended config space only to mainline. the last two near 2.6.25-rc1. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=a0ca9909609470ad779b9b9cc68ce96e975afff7

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] > >> Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Robert Hancock
Andi Kleen wrote: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tested-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> iirc it really was Tested-and-didnt-pass-test-by:

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <[EMAIL

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] > > Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Tested-by: Andi Kleen

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Friday 15 February 2008 03:11:57 am Andi Kleen wrote: > Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] > > Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Tested-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Andi Kleen
Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] > Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Tested-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> iirc it really was Tested-and-didnt-pass-test-by: Andi Kleen

[PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Yinghai Lu
From: Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This path adds validation of the MMCONFIG table against the ACPI reserved motherboard resources. If the MMCONFIG table is found to be reserved in ACPI, we don't bother checking the E820 table. The PCI Express firmware spec apparently tells BIOS

[PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Yinghai Lu
From: Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] This path adds validation of the MMCONFIG table against the ACPI reserved motherboard resources. If the MMCONFIG table is found to be reserved in ACPI, we don't bother checking the E820 table. The PCI Express firmware spec apparently tells BIOS developers

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Andi Kleen
Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tested-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] iirc it really was Tested-and-didnt-pass-test-by: Andi Kleen unfortunately. I

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Friday 15 February 2008 03:11:57 am Andi Kleen wrote: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tested-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] iirc it really

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tested-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andi Kleen wrote: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tested-by: Andi

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources

2008-02-15 Thread Robert Hancock
Andi Kleen wrote: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: many fixes and cleanups] Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tested-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] iirc it really was Tested-and-didnt-pass-test-by: Andi Kleen