Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: ensure we don't truncate top bits of the request command flags

On 03/24/2016 08:08 PM, Mike Christie wrote: On 03/22/2016 02:01 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: On 03/22/2016 12:59 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:15AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: Some of the flags that we want to use from the make_request_fn path are now larger than 32-bit,

Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: ensure we don't truncate top bits of the request command flags

On 03/24/2016 08:08 PM, Mike Christie wrote: On 03/22/2016 02:01 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: On 03/22/2016 12:59 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:15AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: Some of the flags that we want to use from the make_request_fn path are now larger than 32-bit,

Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: ensure we don't truncate top bits of the request command flags

On 03/22/2016 02:01 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 03/22/2016 12:59 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:15AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> Some of the flags that we want to use from the make_request_fn path >>> are now larger than 32-bit, so change the functions involved to

Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: ensure we don't truncate top bits of the request command flags

On 03/22/2016 02:01 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 03/22/2016 12:59 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:15AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> Some of the flags that we want to use from the make_request_fn path >>> are now larger than 32-bit, so change the functions involved to

Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: ensure we don't truncate top bits of the request command flags

On 03/22/2016 12:59 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:15AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: Some of the flags that we want to use from the make_request_fn path are now larger than 32-bit, so change the functions involved to accept an u64 instead of an unsigned int. When did

Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: ensure we don't truncate top bits of the request command flags

On 03/22/2016 12:59 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:15AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: Some of the flags that we want to use from the make_request_fn path are now larger than 32-bit, so change the functions involved to accept an u64 instead of an unsigned int. When did

Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: ensure we don't truncate top bits of the request command flags

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:15AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > Some of the flags that we want to use from the make_request_fn path > are now larger than 32-bit, so change the functions involved to > accept an u64 instead of an unsigned int. When did we start doing that? We really should merge

Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: ensure we don't truncate top bits of the request command flags

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:15AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > Some of the flags that we want to use from the make_request_fn path > are now larger than 32-bit, so change the functions involved to > accept an u64 instead of an unsigned int. When did we start doing that? We really should merge

[PATCH 1/6] block: ensure we don't truncate top bits of the request command flags

Some of the flags that we want to use from the make_request_fn path are now larger than 32-bit, so change the functions involved to accept an u64 instead of an unsigned int. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/blk-core.c | 7 --- block/cfq-iosched.c | 2 +-

[PATCH 1/6] block: ensure we don't truncate top bits of the request command flags

Some of the flags that we want to use from the make_request_fn path are now larger than 32-bit, so change the functions involved to accept an u64 instead of an unsigned int. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/blk-core.c | 7 --- block/cfq-iosched.c | 2 +- block/elevator.c