On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:57:17PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 03/06/2014 12:56 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >Even though nsec based cputime_t maps to u64, nsecs_to_cputime() must
> >return a cputime_t value. We want to enforce this kind of cast in order
> >to track down buggy
Even though nsec based cputime_t maps to u64, nsecs_to_cputime() must
return a cputime_t value. We want to enforce this kind of cast in order
to track down buggy manipulations of cputime_t such as direct access
of its values under wrong assumptions on its backend type (nsecs,
jiffies, etc...) by
Even though nsec based cputime_t maps to u64, nsecs_to_cputime() must
return a cputime_t value. We want to enforce this kind of cast in order
to track down buggy manipulations of cputime_t such as direct access
of its values under wrong assumptions on its backend type (nsecs,
jiffies, etc...) by
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:57:17PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 03/06/2014 12:56 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Even though nsec based cputime_t maps to u64, nsecs_to_cputime() must
return a cputime_t value. We want to enforce this kind of cast in order
to track down buggy manipulations of
On 03/06/2014 12:56 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Even though nsec based cputime_t maps to u64, nsecs_to_cputime() must
return a cputime_t value. We want to enforce this kind of cast in order
to track down buggy manipulations of cputime_t such as direct access
of its values under wrong
Even though nsec based cputime_t maps to u64, nsecs_to_cputime() must
return a cputime_t value. We want to enforce this kind of cast in order
to track down buggy manipulations of cputime_t such as direct access
of its values under wrong assumptions on its backend type (nsecs,
jiffies, etc...) by
Even though nsec based cputime_t maps to u64, nsecs_to_cputime() must
return a cputime_t value. We want to enforce this kind of cast in order
to track down buggy manipulations of cputime_t such as direct access
of its values under wrong assumptions on its backend type (nsecs,
jiffies, etc...) by
On 03/06/2014 12:56 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Even though nsec based cputime_t maps to u64, nsecs_to_cputime() must
return a cputime_t value. We want to enforce this kind of cast in order
to track down buggy manipulations of cputime_t such as direct access
of its values under wrong
8 matches
Mail list logo