Re: [PATCH 1/7] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication

2007-10-15 Thread Steven Rostedt
-- On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Gregory Haskins wrote: > The system currently evaluates all online CPUs whenever one or more enters > an rt_overload condition. This suffers from scalability limitations as > the # of online CPUs increases. So we introduce a cpumask to track > exactly which CPUs need

Re: [PATCH 1/7] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication

2007-10-15 Thread Steven Rostedt
-- On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Gregory Haskins wrote: The system currently evaluates all online CPUs whenever one or more enters an rt_overload condition. This suffers from scalability limitations as the # of online CPUs increases. So we introduce a cpumask to track exactly which CPUs need RT

[PATCH 1/7] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication

2007-10-12 Thread Gregory Haskins
The system currently evaluates all online CPUs whenever one or more enters an rt_overload condition. This suffers from scalability limitations as the # of online CPUs increases. So we introduce a cpumask to track exactly which CPUs need RT balancing. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL

[PATCH 1/7] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication

2007-10-12 Thread Gregory Haskins
The system currently evaluates all online CPUs whenever one or more enters an rt_overload condition. This suffers from scalability limitations as the # of online CPUs increases. So we introduce a cpumask to track exactly which CPUs need RT balancing. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins [EMAIL