From: Dave Hansen
The
if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) < nr_cpu_ids)
line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
it ends up at two different indentation levels. This eliminates
one of the the copy-n-paste versions. It also gives us a
From: Dave Hansen dave.han...@linux.intel.com
The
if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) nr_cpu_ids)
line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
it ends up at two different indentation levels. This eliminates
one of the the copy-n-paste
From: Dave Hansen
The
if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) < nr_cpu_ids)
line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
it ends up at two different indentation levels. This eliminates
one of the the copy-n-paste versions. It also gives us a
From: Dave Hansen dave.han...@linux.intel.com
The
if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) nr_cpu_ids)
line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
it ends up at two different indentation levels. This eliminates
one of the the copy-n-paste
From: Dave Hansen
The
if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) < nr_cpu_ids)
line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
it ends up at two different indentation levels. This eliminates
one of the the copy-n-paste versions. It also gives us a
From: Dave Hansen dave.han...@linux.intel.com
The
if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) nr_cpu_ids)
line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
it ends up at two different indentation levels. This eliminates
one of the the copy-n-paste
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 16:16 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 16:45 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > From: Dave Hansen
> >
> > The
> >
> > if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) < nr_cpu_ids)
> >
> > line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit,
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 16:45 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> From: Dave Hansen
>
> The
>
> if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) < nr_cpu_ids)
>
> line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
> it ends up at two different indentation levels. This
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 16:45 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
From: Dave Hansen dave.han...@linux.intel.com
The
if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) nr_cpu_ids)
line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
it ends up at two different indentation
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 16:16 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 16:45 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
From: Dave Hansen dave.han...@linux.intel.com
The
if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) nr_cpu_ids)
line of code is not exactly the easiest to
From: Dave Hansen
The
if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) < nr_cpu_ids)
line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
it ends up at two different indentation levels. This eliminates
one of the the copy-n-paste versions. It also gives us a
From: Dave Hansen dave.han...@linux.intel.com
The
if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) nr_cpu_ids)
line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
it ends up at two different indentation levels. This eliminates
one of the the copy-n-paste
12 matches
Mail list logo