On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 04:35:37PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On 24 November 2012 12:33, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> > My patch:
> >>> This driver would not compile if ARM_AMBA is selected under x86,
> >>> because "CS" and "DS" are already defined there. But AMBA
> >>> is used in the x86 world by
On 24 November 2012 12:33, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> My patch:
>>> This driver would not compile if ARM_AMBA is selected under x86,
>>> because "CS" and "DS" are already defined there. But AMBA
>>> is used in the x86 world by a PCI-to-AMBA bridge, to be submitted.
>>>
>>> The patch just adds the
My patch:
>> This driver would not compile if ARM_AMBA is selected under x86,
>> because "CS" and "DS" are already defined there. But AMBA
>> is used in the x86 world by a PCI-to-AMBA bridge, to be submitted.
>>
>> The patch just adds the "PL330_" prefix to all register and bit fields,
>> so it ca
On 24 November 2012 06:23, Davide Ciminaghi wrote:
> From: Alessandro Rubini
>
> This driver would not compile if ARM_AMBA is selected under x86,
> because "CS" and "DS" are already defined there. But AMBA
> is used in the x86 world by a PCI-to-AMBA bridge, to be submitted.
>
> The patch just ad
From: Alessandro Rubini
This driver would not compile if ARM_AMBA is selected under x86,
because "CS" and "DS" are already defined there. But AMBA
is used in the x86 world by a PCI-to-AMBA bridge, to be submitted.
The patch just adds the "PL330_" prefix to all register and bit fields,
so it can
5 matches
Mail list logo