Re: [PATCH 1/8 v3] DMA: PL330: use prefix in reg names to build under x86

2012-11-28 Thread Davide Ciminaghi
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 04:35:37PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: > On 24 November 2012 12:33, Alessandro Rubini wrote: > > My patch: > >>> This driver would not compile if ARM_AMBA is selected under x86, > >>> because "CS" and "DS" are already defined there. But AMBA > >>> is used in the x86 world by

Re: [PATCH 1/8 v3] DMA: PL330: use prefix in reg names to build under x86

2012-11-24 Thread Jassi Brar
On 24 November 2012 12:33, Alessandro Rubini wrote: > My patch: >>> This driver would not compile if ARM_AMBA is selected under x86, >>> because "CS" and "DS" are already defined there. But AMBA >>> is used in the x86 world by a PCI-to-AMBA bridge, to be submitted. >>> >>> The patch just adds the

Re: [PATCH 1/8 v3] DMA: PL330: use prefix in reg names to build under x86

2012-11-23 Thread Alessandro Rubini
My patch: >> This driver would not compile if ARM_AMBA is selected under x86, >> because "CS" and "DS" are already defined there. But AMBA >> is used in the x86 world by a PCI-to-AMBA bridge, to be submitted. >> >> The patch just adds the "PL330_" prefix to all register and bit fields, >> so it ca

Re: [PATCH 1/8 v3] DMA: PL330: use prefix in reg names to build under x86

2012-11-23 Thread Jassi Brar
On 24 November 2012 06:23, Davide Ciminaghi wrote: > From: Alessandro Rubini > > This driver would not compile if ARM_AMBA is selected under x86, > because "CS" and "DS" are already defined there. But AMBA > is used in the x86 world by a PCI-to-AMBA bridge, to be submitted. > > The patch just ad

[PATCH 1/8 v3] DMA: PL330: use prefix in reg names to build under x86

2012-11-23 Thread Davide Ciminaghi
From: Alessandro Rubini This driver would not compile if ARM_AMBA is selected under x86, because "CS" and "DS" are already defined there. But AMBA is used in the x86 world by a PCI-to-AMBA bridge, to be submitted. The patch just adds the "PL330_" prefix to all register and bit fields, so it can