Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 12:06:39PM -0700, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > @@ -528,8 +530,7 @@ static ssize_t backing_dev_store(struct device *dev,
> > * freely but in fact, IO is going on so finally could cause
> > * use-after-free when the IO is really done.
> > */
> > - zram->disk->queue-
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 05:03:29PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> BDI_CAP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO is only checked in the swap code, and used to
> decided if ->rw_page can be used on a block device. Just check up for
> the method instead. The only complication is that zram needs a second
> set of block_
BDI_CAP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO is only checked in the swap code, and used to
decided if ->rw_page can be used on a block device. Just check up for
the method instead. The only complication is that zram needs a second
set of block_device_operations as it can switch between modes that
actually support ->rw
BDI_CAP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO is only checked in the swap code, and used to
decided if ->rw_page can be used on a block device. Just check up for
the method instead. The only complication is that zram needs a second
set of block_device_operations as it can switch between modes that
actually support ->rw
BDI_CAP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO is only checked in the swap code, and used to
decided if ->rw_page can be used on a block device. Just check up for
the method instead. The only complication is that zram needs a second
set of block_device_operations as it can switch between modes that
actually support ->rw
BDI_CAP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO is only checked in the swap code, and used to
decided if ->rw_page can be used on a block device. Just check up for
the method instead.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
drivers/block/brd.c | 1 -
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 17 +
drivers
7 matches
Mail list logo
