On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:37:11 -0600
Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:59:25 -0700
> Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > When VT-d driver runs in the guest, PASID allocation must be
> > performed via virtual command interface. This patch register a
> > custom IOASID allocator which takes precedence over the default
> > IDR based allocator. The resulting IOASID allocation will always
> > come from the host. This ensures that PASID namespace is system-
> > wide.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 50
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c index 28cb713..a38d774 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > @@ -4820,6 +4820,42 @@ static int __init
> > platform_optin_force_iommu(void) return 1;
> > }
> >
> > +static ioasid_t intel_ioasid_alloc(ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max,
> > void *data) +{
> > + struct intel_iommu *iommu = data;
> > + ioasid_t ioasid;
> > +
> > + if (vcmd_alloc_pasid(iommu, &ioasid))
> > + return INVALID_IOASID;
> > + return ioasid;
>
> How does this honor min/max?
>
Sorry I missed this in my previous reply.
VT-d virtual command interface always allocate PASIDs with full 20bit
range. I think a range checking is missing here. Thanks for pointing
this out.
> [...]
>
