On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 17:07:18 +0200
Eugen Hristev wrote:
> Optimize the scan index for the differential channels. Before, it
> was single channel count + index of the first single channel
> number of the differential pair. (e.g. 11+0, +2, +4, etc.)
> Divide that
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 17:07:18 +0200
Eugen Hristev wrote:
> Optimize the scan index for the differential channels. Before, it
> was single channel count + index of the first single channel
> number of the differential pair. (e.g. 11+0, +2, +4, etc.)
> Divide that number by two (since it's always
Optimize the scan index for the differential channels. Before, it
was single channel count + index of the first single channel
number of the differential pair. (e.g. 11+0, +2, +4, etc.)
Divide that number by two (since it's always even), and add it up
as a scan index to have consecutive numbered
Optimize the scan index for the differential channels. Before, it
was single channel count + index of the first single channel
number of the differential pair. (e.g. 11+0, +2, +4, etc.)
Divide that number by two (since it's always even), and add it up
as a scan index to have consecutive numbered
4 matches
Mail list logo