Re: [PATCH 11/21] drm/tilcdc: use only a single module device table

2013-04-25 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The tilcdc driver fails to be built as a module because of extraneous > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE entries: > > drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave.o:(.data+0x54): multiple definition of > `__mod_of_device_table' >

Re: [PATCH 11/21] drm/tilcdc: use only a single module device table

2013-04-25 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote: The tilcdc driver fails to be built as a module because of extraneous MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE entries: drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave.o:(.data+0x54): multiple definition of `__mod_of_device_table'

[PATCH 11/21] drm/tilcdc: use only a single module device table

2013-04-23 Thread Arnd Bergmann
The tilcdc driver fails to be built as a module because of extraneous MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE entries: drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave.o:(.data+0x54): multiple definition of `__mod_of_device_table' drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_tfp410.o:(.data+0x54): first defined here

[PATCH 11/21] drm/tilcdc: use only a single module device table

2013-04-23 Thread Arnd Bergmann
The tilcdc driver fails to be built as a module because of extraneous MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE entries: drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave.o:(.data+0x54): multiple definition of `__mod_of_device_table' drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_tfp410.o:(.data+0x54): first defined here