Deepa Dinamani writes:
>> At least, it is wrong to call fat_time_fat2unix() before setup parameters
>> in sbi.
>
> All the parameters that fat_time_fat2unix() cares in sbi is accessed through
>
> static inline int fat_tz_offset(struct msdos_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> return (sbi->options.tz_set ?
>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:31 AM OGAWA Hirofumi
wrote:
>
> Deepa Dinamani writes:
>
> > +/* DOS dates from 1980/1/1 through 2107/12/31 */
> > +#define FAT_DATE_MIN (0<<9 | 1<<5 | 1)
> > +#define FAT_DATE_MAX (127<<9 | 12<<5 | 31)
> > +#define FAT_TIME_MAX (23<<11 | 59<<5 | 29)
> > +
> > /*
> >
Deepa Dinamani writes:
> +/* DOS dates from 1980/1/1 through 2107/12/31 */
> +#define FAT_DATE_MIN (0<<9 | 1<<5 | 1)
> +#define FAT_DATE_MAX (127<<9 | 12<<5 | 31)
> +#define FAT_TIME_MAX (23<<11 | 59<<5 | 29)
> +
> /*
> * A deserialized copy of the on-disk structure laid out in struct
> *
Fill in the appropriate limits to avoid inconsistencies
in the vfs cached inode times when timestamps are
outside the permitted range.
Some FAT variants indicate that the years after 2099 are not supported.
Since commit 7decd1cb0305 ("fat: Fix and cleanup timestamp conversion"),
we support the
4 matches
Mail list logo
