On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:53:51AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:34:14PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:14:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> >
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:34:14PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:14:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > > +int kcompat_sys_statfs64(const char __user * pathname, compat_size_
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:14:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Using this helper allows us to avoid the in-kernel calls to the
> > compat_sys_{f,}statfs64() sycalls, as are necessary for parameter
> > mangling in arm64's compat hand
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Using this helper allows us to avoid the in-kernel calls to the
> compat_sys_{f,}statfs64() sycalls, as are necessary for parameter
> mangling in arm64's compat handling.
>
> Following the example of ksys_* functions, kcompat_sys_* fu
Using this helper allows us to avoid the in-kernel calls to the
compat_sys_{f,}statfs64() sycalls, as are necessary for parameter
mangling in arm64's compat handling.
Following the example of ksys_* functions, kcompat_sys_* functions are
intended to be a drop-in replacement for their compat_sys_*
5 matches
Mail list logo