On 12/11/13 19:42, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The different architectures used their own (and different) declarations:
>
> extern struct boot_param_header __dtb_start;
> extern u32 __dtb_start[];
> extern char __dtb_start[];
>
> Consolidate them using the first variant in .
> This re
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> + if (!initial_boot_params ||
>>> + (be32_to_cpu(initial_boot_params->magic) != OF_DT_HEADER))
>>> + initial_boot_params = &__dtb_start;
>>> +
>>> /* check device tree validity */
>>> - if (be32_to_
On 11/13/2013 11:20 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> wrote:
>>> The different architectures used their own (and different) declarations:
>>>
>>> extern struct boot_param_header __dtb_s
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> The different architectures used their own (and different) declarations:
>>
>> extern struct boot_param_header __dtb_start;
>> extern u32 __dtb_start[];
>> extern char
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> The different architectures used their own (and different) declarations:
>
> extern struct boot_param_header __dtb_start;
> extern u32 __dtb_start[];
> extern char __dtb_start[];
>
> Consolidate them using the first variant i
On 11/13/2013 01:12 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The different architectures used their own (and different) declarations:
>
> extern struct boot_param_header __dtb_start;
> extern u32 __dtb_start[];
> extern char __dtb_start[];
>
> Consolidate them using the first variant in .
> Th
The different architectures used their own (and different) declarations:
extern struct boot_param_header __dtb_start;
extern u32 __dtb_start[];
extern char __dtb_start[];
Consolidate them using the first variant in .
This requires adding a few "address of" operators on architectures w
7 matches
Mail list logo