vh...@infradead.org;
> > > > > platform-driver- x...@vger.kernel.org;
> > > > > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; l...@kernel.org;
> > > > > r...@rjwysocki.net;
> > > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
>
gt; To: Limonciello, Mario
> > > Cc: l...@amacapital.net; dvh...@infradead.org; platform-driver-
> > > x...@vger.kernel.org; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com;
> > > l...@kernel.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-a...@vger.kernel.org S
amacapital.net; dvh...@infradead.org; platform-driver-
> > x...@vger.kernel.org; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com;
> > l...@kernel.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-a...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16]
> > platform/x86:
ad.org; platform-driver-
> > x...@vger.kernel.org; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com;
> > l...@kernel.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-a...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16]
> > platform/x86: wmi-mof: New driver to expose embedded WMI MOF
&g
he...@linux.intel.com; l...@kernel.org;
> r...@rjwysocki.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] platform/x86: wmi-mof: New driver to expose
> embedded WMI MOF metadata
>
> On Wednesday 07 June 2017 22:23:08 mario.limoncie...@dell
..@kernel.org;
> r...@rjwysocki.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] platform/x86: wmi-mof: New driver to expose
> embedded WMI MOF metadata
>
> On Wednesday 07 June 2017 22:23:08 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> > > -Or
t; > Cc: l...@amacapital.net; dvh...@infradead.org; platform-driver-
> > x...@vger.kernel.org; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com;
> > l...@kernel.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-a...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16]
> > platform/x86:
ad.org; platform-driver-
> > x...@vger.kernel.org; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com;
> > l...@kernel.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-a...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16]
> > platform/x86: wmi-mof: New driver to expose embedded WMI M
evche...@linux.intel.com; l...@kernel.org;
> r...@rjwysocki.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] platform/x86: wmi-mof: New driver to expose
> embedded WMI MOF metadata
>
> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 15:56:21 Pali Rohár wrot
..@kernel.org;
> r...@rjwysocki.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] platform/x86: wmi-mof: New driver to expose
> embedded WMI MOF metadata
>
> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 15:56:21 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 June 2017 13
On Tuesday 06 June 2017 15:56:21 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 13:46:16 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> > 2) On my system when you expand the arguments for "void DoBFn" the
> > source doesn't describe individual arguments like you do. Again
> > this might not matter to MOF
On Tuesday 06 June 2017 15:56:21 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 13:46:16 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> > 2) On my system when you expand the arguments for "void DoBFn" the
> > source doesn't describe individual arguments like you do. Again
> > this might not matter to MOF
On Tuesday 06 June 2017 13:46:16 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> Pali,
>
> Amazing job with what you've done so far. A few comments I wanted to share
> from my taking look at your bmf2mof and comparing to "source" MOF.
> 1) At least in source the case used for String and Boolean is lower
On Tuesday 06 June 2017 13:46:16 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> Pali,
>
> Amazing job with what you've done so far. A few comments I wanted to share
> from my taking look at your bmf2mof and comparing to "source" MOF.
> 1) At least in source the case used for String and Boolean is lower
t;mario_limoncie...@dell.com>; Rafael
> Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Linux ACPI a...@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] platform/x86: wmi-mof: New driver to expose
> embedded WMI MOF metadata
>
> On Monday 05 June 2017 15:39:44 Andy
y, June 6, 2017 6:06 AM
> To: Andy Lutomirski
> Cc: Darren Hart ; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org;
> Andy Shevchenko ; Andy Lutomirski
> ; Limonciello, Mario ; Rafael
> Wysocki ; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Linux ACPI a...@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATC
On Monday 05 June 2017 15:39:44 Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 June 2017 00:14:56 Darren Hart wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 01:14:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> > > metadata. I think that Samba has tools
On Monday 05 June 2017 15:39:44 Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 June 2017 00:14:56 Darren Hart wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 01:14:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> > > metadata. I think that Samba has tools to interpret it, but
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 12:19:26AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 00:14:56 Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 01:14:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > metadata. I think that Samba has tools to interpret it, but there
> > > > is currently no interface to get the
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 12:19:26AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 00:14:56 Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 01:14:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > metadata. I think that Samba has tools to interpret it, but there
> > > > is currently no interface to get the
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 00:14:56 Darren Hart wrote:
>> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 01:14:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> > > metadata. I think that Samba has tools to interpret it, but there
>> > > is currently no interface to
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 00:14:56 Darren Hart wrote:
>> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 01:14:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> > > metadata. I think that Samba has tools to interpret it, but there
>> > > is currently no interface to get the data in the
On Tuesday 06 June 2017 00:14:56 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 01:14:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > metadata. I think that Samba has tools to interpret it, but there
> > > is currently no interface to get the data in the first place.
> >
> > No, there is no non-ms-windows tool
On Tuesday 06 June 2017 00:14:56 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 01:14:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > metadata. I think that Samba has tools to interpret it, but there
> > > is currently no interface to get the data in the first place.
> >
> > No, there is no non-ms-windows tool
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 01:14:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi! Note that in WMI is stored binary MOF (BMOF; .bmf file; compiled
> MOF), not ordinary MOF data which are plain text. So maybe it could make
> sense to include "B" into name of sysfs entry? Or not? (Just suggestion)
Did some
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 01:14:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi! Note that in WMI is stored binary MOF (BMOF; .bmf file; compiled
> MOF), not ordinary MOF data which are plain text. So maybe it could make
> sense to include "B" into name of sysfs entry? Or not? (Just suggestion)
Did some
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 May 2017 17:24:54 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 14:07 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Pali Rohár
>> > wrote:
>> > > > Quite a few
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 May 2017 17:24:54 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 14:07 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Pali Rohár
>> > wrote:
>> > > > Quite a few laptops (and maybe servers?) have embedded
On Tuesday 30 May 2017 17:24:54 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 14:07 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Pali Rohár
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > Quite a few laptops (and maybe servers?) have embedded WMI MOF
> > >
> > > Not "a few",
On Tuesday 30 May 2017 17:24:54 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 14:07 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Pali Rohár
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > Quite a few laptops (and maybe servers?) have embedded WMI MOF
> > >
> > > Not "a few", but "lots of" :-)
>
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 06:24:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 14:07 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Pali Rohár
> > wrote:
> > > > Quite a few laptops (and maybe servers?) have embedded WMI MOF
> > >
> > > Not "a
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 06:24:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 14:07 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Pali Rohár
> > wrote:
> > > > Quite a few laptops (and maybe servers?) have embedded WMI MOF
> > >
> > > Not "a few", but "lots of"
On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 14:07 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> > > Quite a few laptops (and maybe servers?) have embedded WMI MOF
> >
> > Not "a few", but "lots of" :-)
Aren't they are synonyms ("quite a few" vs "lots
On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 14:07 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> > > Quite a few laptops (and maybe servers?) have embedded WMI MOF
> >
> > Not "a few", but "lots of" :-)
Aren't they are synonyms ("quite a few" vs "lots of")?
--
Andy
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi! Note that in WMI is stored binary MOF (BMOF; .bmf file; compiled
> MOF), not ordinary MOF data which are plain text. So maybe it could make
> sense to include "B" into name of sysfs entry? Or not? (Just suggestion)
>
>
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi! Note that in WMI is stored binary MOF (BMOF; .bmf file; compiled
> MOF), not ordinary MOF data which are plain text. So maybe it could make
> sense to include "B" into name of sysfs entry? Or not? (Just suggestion)
>
> On Saturday 27 May
Hi! Note that in WMI is stored binary MOF (BMOF; .bmf file; compiled
MOF), not ordinary MOF data which are plain text. So maybe it could make
sense to include "B" into name of sysfs entry? Or not? (Just suggestion)
On Saturday 27 May 2017 07:31:29 Darren Hart wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski
Hi! Note that in WMI is stored binary MOF (BMOF; .bmf file; compiled
MOF), not ordinary MOF data which are plain text. So maybe it could make
sense to include "B" into name of sysfs entry? Or not? (Just suggestion)
On Saturday 27 May 2017 07:31:29 Darren Hart wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski
>
From: Andy Lutomirski
Quite a few laptops (and maybe servers?) have embedded WMI MOF
metadata. I think that Samba has tools to interpret it, but there is
currently no interface to get the data in the first place.
In most cases, the MOF can be read out of the DSDT, but that is
From: Andy Lutomirski
Quite a few laptops (and maybe servers?) have embedded WMI MOF
metadata. I think that Samba has tools to interpret it, but there is
currently no interface to get the data in the first place.
In most cases, the MOF can be read out of the DSDT, but that is
non-compliant and
40 matches
Mail list logo