On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 14:14 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc cannot prove that the value of sdata->vif.type does not
> change between the switch() statement and the second
> comparison to NL80211_IFTYPE_AP, causing a harmless
> warning.
> Slightly reordering the code makes the warning go away
>
gcc cannot prove that the value of sdata->vif.type does not
change between the switch() statement and the second
comparison to NL80211_IFTYPE_AP, causing a harmless
warning.
Slightly reordering the code makes the warning go away
with no functional change.
Without this patch, building ARM
gcc cannot prove that the value of sdata-vif.type does not
change between the switch() statement and the second
comparison to NL80211_IFTYPE_AP, causing a harmless
warning.
Slightly reordering the code makes the warning go away
with no functional change.
Without this patch, building ARM
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 14:14 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
gcc cannot prove that the value of sdata-vif.type does not
change between the switch() statement and the second
comparison to NL80211_IFTYPE_AP, causing a harmless
warning.
Slightly reordering the code makes the warning go away
with no
4 matches
Mail list logo