Sorry all, appears some replies got stuck in my outbox and have just managed to
send for some reason!
Jonathan
On 04/12/16 11:55, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 04/12/16 02:19, Brian Masney wrote:
>> The isl29028 staging driver contains a legacy binding of "isl,isl29028"
>> that is marked as
Sorry all, appears some replies got stuck in my outbox and have just managed to
send for some reason!
Jonathan
On 04/12/16 11:55, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 04/12/16 02:19, Brian Masney wrote:
>> The isl29028 staging driver contains a legacy binding of "isl,isl29028"
>> that is marked as
On 04/12/16 02:19, Brian Masney wrote:
> The isl29028 staging driver contains a legacy binding of "isl,isl29028"
> that is marked as legacy and to not use. There are no in tree references
> to that binding. This patch removes the legacy binding in preparation
> for moving the driver out of
On 04/12/16 02:19, Brian Masney wrote:
> The isl29028 staging driver contains a legacy binding of "isl,isl29028"
> that is marked as legacy and to not use. There are no in tree references
> to that binding. This patch removes the legacy binding in preparation
> for moving the driver out of
The isl29028 staging driver contains a legacy binding of "isl,isl29028"
that is marked as legacy and to not use. There are no in tree references
to that binding. This patch removes the legacy binding in preparation
for moving the driver out of staging. Otherwise, we will have to support
this
The isl29028 staging driver contains a legacy binding of "isl,isl29028"
that is marked as legacy and to not use. There are no in tree references
to that binding. This patch removes the legacy binding in preparation
for moving the driver out of staging. Otherwise, we will have to support
this
6 matches
Mail list logo
